Leucadia offers an opportunity to escape master planed HOA conformity. Leucadia has been anything but superficial. We have a lot of character and part of that has to do with how our community has evolved.
I am big on form meeting function and for using the resources that you have on the ground and working with those elements to meet your needs. Doing so results in a unique character that is a genuine reflection of our place and its people.
Some of the characteristics of Leucadian neighborhoods are big lots with lots of fruit trees, Torrey pines, and palms and you will find streets framed with grass and old plantings.

Years ago, it wasn't uncommon for people to say these neighborhoods reminded them of Hawaii.

I haven't heard that recently. Now we have these awful gravel swales along the sides of the road.

Apparently, the city forces people to do this. Not only does this reduce the curb appeal, and thus the value of our neighborhoods, it reduces the safety of our streets for pedestrians and bikers. There is no way kids can ride their bikes through the gravel, so they are funneled in to narrow roads in front of moving cars.

This is made worse by the fact that the city has been allowing developers to use some of the street for the gravel beds. In the above picture, about two feet of asphalt was torn out. This practice is pushing kids further toward the middle of the road.
It is not comfortable to walk through the gravel, so people walk in the way of auto traffic. It sure ain't making Leucadia more walkable. It is making walking less desirable and dangerous.

You might not even have the opportunity to walk in the gravel. In the above picture it shows how the city tried to shove parking, drainage, utilities, and a walking path on top of each other. This particular gravel swale fills with weeds and makes the street look ghetto.
Why bother?
Does the city maintain these swales? Can anyone argue that this is good for property values? I've talked to a couple developers who don't think so and who would rather not do this crap (their description).
Here is a tale of two developers on Vulcan.


One developer put in a heartwarming gravel trap and the other put in a more finished look with curbs and a sidewalk. Two different approaches just down the street from each other.
Does this mean that developers have a choice? Ugly gravel that requires maintenance (Option A) or gutters and sidewalks (Option B)? I hope this is not what is going on, because it seems totally dumb. If the city is willing to allow all the hardscape of Option B, why not allow grass to the edge of the street (Option L)? Option L would result in less hardscape and allow way more percolation than Option B.
Another question. Why don't we see people in New Encinitas being forced to cut out their sidewalks out and put in gravel pits? Why does Leucadia get special treatment?

Here is a tale of two sides of one development.


On one street it is junkyard gravel and the other a nice gutter. The gutter moves the water quickly down the street and into the storm drain. Why no gravel pits here?
Then there are cases where the engineering goes right to the edge of the asphalt. No escape for kids on bikes and there is no reduction in drainage. Why no gravel pits here?
Why are some people forced to do gravel pits and not others?